Why the study?
What are the prognostic factors and outcomes for patients with metastatic Ewing sarcoma and PNET of bone at diagnosis?
What are the prognostic factors and outcomes for patients with metastatic Ewing sarcoma and PNET of bone at diagnosis?
Small primary tumor size (<10 cm) and the presence of lung metastases alone are significant favorable prognostic factors for survival in metastatic Ewing sarcoma/PNET of bone.
Lung-only metastases and small primaries may aid risk stratification in metastatic Ewing sarcoma; leaves open whether therapy intensification benefits higher-risk subgroups.
BACKGROUND: To evaluate outcome and prognostic factors in Saudi Arabian patients with metastatic Ewing sarcoma and PNET of bone (PMES) at diagnosis. PROCEDURE: Ninety-nine of 304 (33%) consecutive patients with Ewing sarcoma and PNET of bone registered at our centre from 1975 to 1998, had metastatic disease at registration and 93 were available for analysis. The maximum x-axis diameter of the primary tumor was used as the measure of primary tumor size. Usually a trial of systemic treatment was undertaken before a decision was made on local treatment. Standard chemotherapy regimens were used in all treated patients. Forty-one (44%) patients did not receive radical local treatment due to an inadequate response to chemotherapy, or a decision not to undertake more than palliative treatment. Radical treatment of the primary site was radiation alone 41 (79%), resection alone 7 (13%), and resection and radiation 4 (8%). RESULTS: The 5-year survival rates were 9% for all 93 evaluable patients, 16% for 52 patients who received chemotherapy and radical local treatment, 0% for 41 patients who received lesser treatment, 19% for 43 patients with lung metastases alone, and 0% (P = 0.002) for 50 patients with other sites involved. For 60 patients with imaging data, 5-year survivals were 34 and 0% when the maximum transverse diameter of the primary tumor was < 10 cm (N = 20) and > or = 10 cm (N = 40), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Small primary tumor size and the presence of lung metastases alone were the only significant favorable prognostic factors. Earlier diagnosis will be the basis for better results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jenkin et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: