Why the study?
Does intravascular infusion of recombinant adenovirus induce acute hemodynamic responses in mice?
Does intravascular infusion of recombinant adenovirus induce acute hemodynamic responses in mice?
Intravascular recombinant adenovirus induces acute, potentially dose-limiting hemodynamic responses (bradycardia, hypotension) in mice, which are mediated by Kupffer cells and can be mitigated by specific neutralizing antibodies or tachyphylaxis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Alerts to acute hemodynamic risks with intravascular rAd vectors in mice; leaves open translation and mitigation strategies for clinical gene therapy.
Intravascular administration of recombinant adenovirus (rAd) in cancer patients has been well tolerated. However, dose-limiting hemodynamic responses associated with suppression of cardiac output have been observed at doses of 7.5 x 10(13) particles. While analysis of hemodynamic responses induced by small-molecule pharmaceuticals is well established, little is known about the cardiovascular effects of rAd. Telemetric cardiovascular (CV) monitoring in mice was utilized to measure hemodynamic events following intravascular rAd administration. Electrocardiogram analysis revealed a block in the SA node 3-4 min postinfusion, resulting in secondary pacemaking initiated at the AV node. This was associated with acute bradycardia, reduced blood pressure, and hypothermia followed by gradual recovery. Adenovirus-primed murine sera with high neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers could inhibit CV responses, whereas human sera with equivalent nAb titers induced by natural infection were, surprisingly, not inhibitory. Interestingly, repeat dosing within 2-4 h of the primary injection resulted in desensitization, resembling tachyphylaxis, for subsequent CV responses. Last, depletion of Kupffer cells prior to rAd infusion precluded induction of CV responses. These inhibitory effects suggest that rAd interactions with certain cells of the reticular endothelial system are associated with induction of CV responses. Significantly, these studies may provide insight into management of acute adverse effects following rAd systemic delivery, enabling a broadening of therapeutic index.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Machemer et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: