Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: On the basis of the activity of paclitaxel as a single agent in chemotherapy-naive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix in a prior Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trial, a phase II study of paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line therapy was conducted by the GOG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility included squamous cell cancer of the cervix not curable by surgery or radiation, measurable disease, WBC count > or = 3,000/microL, platelet count > or = 100, 000/microL, serum creatinine > or = 2 mg/100 mL, and adequate hepatic function. The starting dose was paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) infused over 24 hours followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) every 21 days. On the basis of toxicity, a dose escalation of paclitaxel to a maximum dose of 170 mg/m(2)/d was prescribed. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were enrolled onto this study; 44 patients were assessable for toxicity and 41 for response. Forty (90.9%) had received prior radiation therapy. A median of six courses of chemotherapy was given (range, one to 10 courses). Neutropenia grade 3 (15.9%) and 4 (61.4%) was the most frequent severe adverse effect and was associated with fever in 13 patients (27.7%). Two patients (4.5%) died from neutropenic sepsis. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 6.8% of patients. Of 41 assessable patients, five (12.2%) had complete responses and 14 (34.1%) had partial responses for an overall response rate of 46.3% (95% confidence interval, 30.7% to 62.6%). The median progression-free interval, was 5.4+ months (range, 0.3 to 22+ months) with a median survival of 10.0+ months (range, 0.9 to 22. 2 months). Response was more frequent in patients with disease in nonirradiated sites (70% v 23%, P =.008). CONCLUSION: This regimen seems highly active in advanced and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix and is currently being evaluated by the GOG in a phase III randomized study comparing the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin with cisplatin alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rose et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: