Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent, bioaccumulative chemicals that can cross the placenta, posing potential immunomodulatory risks to offspring. Epidemiological data on PFAS, particularly emerging alternatives (e.g., Cl-PFESA and its isomers) and comprehensive maternal-child inflammation, remain limited. Based on a birth cohort in Wuhan, we quantified 32 PFAS concentrations in cord serum, used as a proxy for late-pregnancy maternal exposure and validated via paired maternal-cord data. We then assessed their associations with multiple inflammatory cytokines measured in maternal serum during pregnancy ( n = 559) and in child serum at 3.05 ± 0.4 years of age ( n = 459). We found that several PFAS were associated with lower IL-17A levels during pregnancy. The significant association was observed for PFHxS (β = −0.19; 95% CI: −0.28, −0.09; P- FDR = 0.003), followed by 6:2 Cl-PFESA (β = −0.13; 95% CI: −0.21, −0.05; P- FDR = 0.015). By applying weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression, we found that the PFAS mixture was significantly associated with lower concentrations of IL-17A during pregnancy (WQS-index: -0.19; 95% CI: −0.29, −0.09, P < 0.001 ). Three main components were determined via principal component analysis. Principal Component 1 (PFOS and its substitutes) was the main component associated with IL-17A during pregnancy. For childhood inflammation, PFAS isomers were associated with lower periostin concentrations, including 5 m-PFOA (β = −0.10; 95% CI: −0.16, −0.04; P- FDR = 0.032), 6 m-PFOA (β = −0.10; 95% CI: −0.17, −0.03; P- FDR = 0.048), and br-PFHxS (β = −0.11; 95% CI: −0.18, −0.04; P- FDR = 0.036). This study suggested that prenatal PFAS exposure might be linked to altered IL-17A during pregnancy and childhood periostin levels, but causality was not established. Future research should evaluate whether these inflammatory signatures translate into clinical immune dysfunction or allergic diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: