Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We collected data from 20 saline lakes (total dissolved solids from 1000 to 91 000 mg∙L −1 ) in southeastern Alberta to compare relationships between phosphorus, nitrogen, and phytoplankton standing crop with those in freshwater lakes. In 18 lakes, Na + , Mg 2+ , SO 4 2− , and HCO 3 − -CO 3 2− were the dominant ions. In these lakes there was a significant positive correlation between Ca 2+ and chlorophyll a (Chl a), and there were significant negative correlations between Chl a and conductivity, pH, Na + , Mg 2+ , SO 4 2− , HCO 3 − , and CO 3 2− . When all 20 lakes were considered there were no significant relationships between Chl a and phosphorus or nitrogen. Empirical relationships for freshwater lakes, based on spring or summer total phosphorus (TP) or total nitrogen (TN), overestimated Chl a in all the study lakes. However, in saline lakes with similar ionic composition and TN to TP ratios greater than 12 (by weight), there was a significant positive relationship between TP and Chl a. For the saline lakes with TN to TP ratios greater than 12, the deviations between the Chl a levels predicted from models developed for freshwater lakes and the observed levels were positively correlated with conductivity, total dissolved solids, and Na + (r 2 = 0.78–0.82, P < 0.001). We developed the first empirical model that describes nutrient – Chl a relationships for inland saline lakes. The deviation of measured phytoplankton biomass from that predicted by models developed for freshwater lakes can be explained by conductivity or dominant ion concentration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bierhuizen et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: