Why the study?
Does the intracoronary-electrocardiogram-triggered distal pressure/aortic pressure ratio (ICE-T) improve diagnostic accuracy for myocardial ischemia compared to instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) in patients with chronic stable angina?
Does the intracoronary-electrocardiogram-triggered distal pressure/aortic pressure ratio (ICE-T) improve diagnostic accuracy for myocardial ischemia compared to instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) in patients with chronic stable angina?
The novel intracoronary-electrocardiogram-triggered pressure ratio (ICE-T) provides a more stable and accurate diagnostic index for myocardial ischemia than iFR, particularly in borderline cases.
We identified the period in the IC-ECG in which resting Pd/Pa was low and constant. The IC-ECG-based algorithm may improve the accuracy of diagnosing myocardial ischemia, without increasing invasiveness, compared with pressure-dependent indices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakayama et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: