Why the study?
Does the addition of clinical parameters to current guidelines improve the prediction of obstructive CAD in patients with unstable angina referred for acute coronary angiography?
Does the addition of clinical parameters to current guidelines improve the prediction of obstructive CAD in patients with unstable angina referred for acute coronary angiography?
A derived clinical score improves the pre-test probability assessment for obstructive CAD in unstable angina compared to current guidelines, potentially reducing unnecessary acute coronary angiographies.
Guideline criteria show limited predictive value for obstructive CAD in UA; leaves open whether alternative variables improve pre-test selection.
Objective: Patients referred for acute coronary angiography (CAG) with unstable angina (UA) have low mortality and low rate of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Better pre-test selection criteria are warranted. We aimed to assess the current guidelines against other clinical variables as predictors of obstructive CAD in patients with UA referred for acute CAG. Methods: From 2005 to 2012, all CAGs performed at the University Hospital of North Norway, the sole provider of CAG in the region, were recorded in a registry. We included 979 admissions of UA and retrospectively collected data regarding presenting clinical parameters from patient hospital records. Obstructive CAD was defined as ≥50% stenosis and considered prognostically significant if found in the left main stem, proximal LAD or all three main coronary arteries. Characteristics were analysed by logistic regression analysis. A score was developed using ORs from significant factors in a multivariable model. Results: The overall rate of obstructive CAD was 45%, and the rate of prognostically significant CAD was 11%. The risk criteria recommended in American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology guidelines had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.58. Adding clinical information increased the AUC to 0.77 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.80). Applying the derived score, we found that 56% (n=546) of patients had a score of <13, which was associated with a negative predictive value of 95% for prognostic significant CAD. Conclusions: The current results suggest that CAG may be postponed or cancelled in more than half of patients with UA by improving pre-test selection criteria with the addition of clinical parameters to current guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fladseth et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: