Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We evaluated the use of mannitol salt agar with oxacillin for use as a primary screening medium for the simultaneous detection and identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in clinical surveillance specimens. Oxacillin agar dilution susceptibility tests with mannitol salt agar and Mueller-Hinton agar were performed in parallel with disk-agar diffusion testing on 95 oxacillin-susceptible and 105 oxacillin-resistant S. aureus stock isolates. MICs were found to be comparable, showing distinct separation of susceptible and resistant isolates into two groups with MICs of less than or equal to 2 and greater than or equal to 32 micrograms/ml, respectively. In accord with these findings, 4 micrograms of oxacillin per ml was selected for use in the screening medium. For performance evaluation, mannitol salt agar with 4 micrograms of oxacillin per ml was compared with mannitol salt agar without oxacillin by performing parallel screening tests on 153 clinical surveillance specimens. For detection of methicillin-resistant S. aureus, mannitol salt agar with 4 micrograms of oxacillin per ml was as sensitive as mannitol salt agar without oxacillin and required significantly fewer confirmatory tests. For primary identification of methicillin-resistant S. aureus, mannitol salt agar with 4 micrograms of oxacillin per ml was 6.4% false-positive and 1.1% false-negative, with a 93.6% positive predictive value. These findings indicate that mannitol salt agar with 4 micrograms of oxacillin per ml can be used as a reliable and cost-effective screening medium for the simultaneous detection and identification of methicillin-resistant S. aureus in clinical surveillance specimens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lally et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: