Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two samples of dendrimer‐like miktoarm star terpolymers: (poly( tert ‐butyl acrylate)) 3 ‐(polystyrene‐poly(ε‐caprolactone)) 3 (P t BA) 3 ‐(PS‐PCL) 3 , and (PS) 3 ‐(P t BA‐poly(ethylene glycol) 3 were prepared using efficient Cu catalyzed Huisgen cycloaddition (click reaction). As a first step, azido‐terminated 3‐arm star polymers P t BA and PS as core (A) were synthesized by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of t BA and St, respectively, followed by the conversion of bromide end group to azide. Secondly, PS‐PCL and P t BA‐PEG block copolymers with alkyne group at the junction as peripheral arms (B‐C) were obtained via multiple living polymerization mechanisms such as nitroxide mediated radical polymerization (NMP) of St, ring opening polymerization (ROP) of ε‐CL, ATRP of t BA. Thus obtained core and peripheral arms were linked via click reaction to give target (A) 3 ‐(B‐C) 3 dendrimer‐like miktoarm star terpolymers. (P t BA) 3 ‐(PS‐PCL) 3 and (PS) 3 ‐(PEG‐P t BA) 3 have been characterized by GPC, DSC, AFM, and SAXS measurements. (P t BA) 3 ‐(PS‐PCL) 3 did not show any self‐organization with annealing due to the miscibility of the peripheral arm segments. In contrast, the micro‐phase separation of the peripheral arm segments in (PS) 3 ‐(P t BA‐PEG) 3 resulted in self‐organized phase‐separated morphology with a long period of ∼ 13 nm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Altintas et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: