Why the study?
Does a novel elastic vascular prosthesis preserve aortic windkessel function and valve hemodynamics compared to native aorta and Dacron prostheses in a porcine mock circulation model?
Does a novel elastic vascular prosthesis preserve aortic windkessel function and valve hemodynamics compared to native aorta and Dacron prostheses in a porcine mock circulation model?
A novel elastic vascular prosthesis preserves aortic windkessel function and valve hemodynamics in an in vitro porcine model, suggesting potential biomechanical benefits over standard Dacron grafts for valve-sparing aortic root replacement.
Elastic grafts may restore haemodynamics in vitro; leaves open clinical translation to aortic replacement.
OBJECTIVES: Prosthetic replacement of the thoracic aorta with common Dacron prostheses impairs the aortic 'windkessel' and, in valve-sparing procedures, also aortic valve function. Elastic graft material may overcome these deficiencies. METHODS: Fresh porcine aortas including the root were set up in a mock circulation before and after replacement of the ascending part with a novel vascular prosthesis providing elastic behaviours. In a first series (n = 14), haemodynamics and leaflet motions of the aortic valve were investigated and also cyclic changes of aortic dimensions at different levels of the root. In a second series (n = 7), intravascular pressure and dimensions of the proximal descending aorta were measured and the corresponding wall tension was calculated. RESULTS: Haemodynamics of the aortic valve remain comparable after replacement. Though the novel prosthesis does not feature such high distensibility as the native aorta, the dynamic of the root was significantly increased compared with common Dacron prostheses at the commissural level, preserving 'windkessel' function. Thus, wall tension of the residual aorta remained unchanged; nevertheless, maximum pressure-time differential dp/dt increased by 13%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the novel elastic prosthesis for replacement of the ascending aorta seems to be beneficial, especially with regard to the preservation of the aortic windkessel. Further studies will be needed to clarify long-term utilization of the material in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scharfschwerdt et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: