This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The rate-determining step in electrochemically driven C–H bond formation with CO 2 is often hydride transfer (HT) to the substrate, which is a chemical step that follows the electron transfer (ET) and proton transfer (PT) elementary steps that comprise hydride formation. In the HT step, reaction with protons to give H 2 or reaction with CO 2 to give formate can occur. The properties of the catalyst-hydride intermediate, along with the characteristics of the reaction solution, will determine both the product selectivity and the overall rate of catalysis. Herein, we characterize and discuss the role of H-bond accepting functional groups on HT. The well-characterized HT catalyst Na(diglyme) 2 [Fe 4 N(CO) 12 ] was used for this study along with six derivatives of the cluster that contain H-bond accepting functional groups in the secondary coordination sphere (SCS). We demonstrate that the rate of HT to a substrate, H + or CO 2, directly controls the selectivity for formate vs H 2 formation, that there is no direct correlation of the HT rate with H-bond accepting features of the microenvironment, and that the proton source in the reaction solution modulates the observed effects of H-bond accepting SCS. These results illustrate that studies of the H-bond accepting properties of a catalyst microenvironment require consideration of many factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: