Why the study?
Does transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCS) accurately detect spontaneous cross-flow via the anterior communicating artery compared to digital subtraction angiography in adult patients with suspected high-grade carotid artery stenosis?
Does transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCS) accurately detect spontaneous cross-flow via the anterior communicating artery compared to digital subtraction angiography in adult patients with suspected high-grade carotid artery stenosis?
Non-invasive TCCS is highly reliable for detecting the presence of reversed flow in the ACA in patients with ICA stenosis, though it has only moderate agreement with DSA in quantifying the exact extent of cross-flow.
Supports TCCS for binary ACA reversal detection in ICA stenosis; leaves open its role for precise cross-flow grading.
PURPOSE: Our purpose was to evaluate the agreement of transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCS) measurements and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings in determining the extent of spontaneous cross-flow via the anterior communicating artery (AcoA) in patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. METHODS: Thirty adult patients with suspected uni- or bilateral high-grade carotid artery stenosis were prospectively examined by DSA and angle-corrected TCCS. The extent of cross-flow was determined considering retrograde flow in the ipsilateral anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and sideto-side differences of the A1-segments of the ACA and middle cerebral arteries (MCAs) by both techniques. Cross-flow was angiographically categorized by means of a four-step scale. DSA findings were correlated with side-to-side differences in mean blood flow velocity as well as flow direction measured by TCCS. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 30 patients had a uni- or bilateral ICA stenosis of >49%. Excellent agreement between TCCS and DSA was evaluated for the detection of lack (grades 0 and 1) or presence (grades 2 and 3) of reversed flow in the ACA (sensitivity 100%, specificity 93%, positive predictive value 94%). Post hoc analysis of the mean velocities in the ACA and MCA revealed a side-to-side difference of 25 cm/s as a cutting point allowing for definition of a corresponding four-grade scale for ultrasound. However, full agreement, i.e.same grade of cross-flow detected by both techniques, was only found in 17(57%) of 30 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive TCCS is reliable for detecting reversed flow in the ACA in patients with ICA stenosis. However, there is only a moderate agreement between angiography and TCCS in quantifying the extent of spontaneous anterior cross-flow because different information on the intracranial hemodynamics may be obtained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schulte‐Altedorneburg et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: