Why the study?
Does transcranial Doppler ultrasonography accurately detect high-grade (≥70%) internal carotid artery stenosis compared to cerebral angiography?
Does transcranial Doppler ultrasonography accurately detect high-grade (≥70%) internal carotid artery stenosis compared to cerebral angiography?
TCD measurement of flow acceleration provides fairly reliable detection of high-grade carotid stenosis and can serve as a useful noninvasive screening tool.
May support TCD flow acceleration for noninvasive screening of high-grade carotid stenosis; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective validation.
We evaluated the ability of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) of the middle cerebral artery to detect internal carotid artery luminal area stenosis of 70% or greater by comparing TCD with cerebral angiography in 79 subjects, including 22 with normal cerebral arteriograms and 57 with 30% to 100% internal carotid artery stenosis on at least one side. Of six TCD measurements assessed, the flow acceleration provided the greatest sensitivity (82%) and specificity (73%) in distinguishing 70% to 100% carotid stenosis from lesser degrees of stenosis. The overall accuracy of the flow acceleration was 78%, and the positive predictive value was 79%. A flow acceleration of 351.6 cm/sec2 or less was useful for detecting high-grade stenosis, but there was difficulty in distinguishing unilateral from bilateral high-grade stenosis. TCD measurement of the flow acceleration allows for fairly reliable detection of high-grade stenosis and can thus serve as a useful indirect component of a carotid noninvasive battery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kelley et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: