Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper outlines a methodology for making an educational technology ready for being embedded in classrooms. It presents the theoretical orientation and methodological principles that informed the innovation process of the ROSA project (Robot-supported Education for Autistic Children): an interdisciplinary, complex and longitudinal research and innovation initiative involving autistic pupils, teachers, parents, innovators, technologists/developers, school managers and researchers from different disciplines. Underpinned by social learning theory, practical ethics, participatory design and co-creation theory, it was situated in a special school in Norway. Based on theoretical underpinnings and rigorous cross-disciplinary dialogues, five methodological principles emerged as preconditions for successful user-centred innovation: (1) iterative ethical reflection; (2) participation and co-creation; (3) dyadic systems convening; (4) learning from the practitioners and (5) learning from the autistic pupils. The paper discusses how these principles were implemented through a cyclical process of awareness, identification, reflection and action. The principles emphasized human interaction over technology-driven instruction and real-world applicability over theory- or interest-driven solutions. The paper makes a significant contribution to the empirical research on the methodology of innovation of robot-mediated education, and it provides guidance for researchers and policymakers on methodological principles for participatory and ethically responsible research and innovation in the field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guldberg et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: