Key result
Cerebral arteriography shows ~3.4-fold higher diagnostic yield in non-hypertensive vs hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.
Observational (n=102)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We retrospectively assessed the diagnostic value of cerebral arteriography for the search of an etiology in 102 patients with nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhages evaluated between 1980 and 1985. Arteriography was diagnostic in 22 of 50 non-hypertensive patients and in only 6 of 47 hypertensive patients. Five patients with a bleeding diathesis had normal arteriography. From the total group, we found 12 saccular aneurysms, 9 arteriovenous malformations, 3 cases of moya-moya and 3 instances of superior sagittal sinus thrombosis. One patient had metastatic choriocarcinoma. Sites of hemorrhage among all patients with diagnostic arteriograms were: lobar 19, intraventricular 5, thalamic 2, caudate 1, and corpus callosum 1. Lobar hemorrhages in the non-hypertensive group and intraventricular hemorrhages in hypertensive individuals had the highest yield of arteriographic abnormalities. We believe cerebral arteriography is indicated in non-hypertensive patients with lobar hemorrhages. Most hypertensive patients, in particular those with putaminal hemorrhages, do not require arteriography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toffol et al. (1986) conducted an observational in Nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (n=102). Cerebral arteriography (in non-hypertensive patients) vs. Hypertensive patients was evaluated on Diagnostic yield of cerebral arteriography for an underlying etiology. Cerebral arteriography was diagnostic in 44.0% (22/50) of non-hypertensive patients compared to 12.8% (6/47) of hypertensive patients with nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: