Why the study?
Does cord blood cell therapy improve heart function and LV remodeling in rat models of myocardial infarction?
Does cord blood cell therapy improve heart function and LV remodeling in rat models of myocardial infarction?
Cord blood cell therapy in rat MI models alters extracellular matrix and cytokine expression via paracrine mechanisms but fails to improve cardiac function or induce myocyte regeneration.
Does not improve function or remodeling in rat MI despite ECM/IL-6 changes; leaves open whether paracrine effects can be harnessed in targeted studies.
OBJECTIVE: In this study the ability of unrestricted somatic stem cells (USSC) and mononuclear cord blood cells (MN-CBC) was tested to improve heart function and left ventricular (LV) remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: The cells were delivered by i.v. or intramyocardial injections in rat models of MI by permanent coronary artery occlusion and by ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Heart function and remodeling was followed by recurrent echocardiography over 8 or 12 weeks after which catheterization was performed. RESULTS: Although injected labeled cells could be observed within the myocardium for up to 6 d, there was no sign of cardiac regeneration 8 or 12 weeks after MI. However, the mRNA expression of components of the extracellular matrix was attenuated in the infarct scar 12 weeks after MI and cell injection. Additionally, the expression of interleukin (IL)-6 but not of IL-1 beta increased at the site of injury and the adjacent border-zone 12 weeks after I/R and USSC-injection. However, these effects did not translate into improved heart function or attenuated LV dilatation. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that cord blood cell implantation after MI acts through paracrine mechanisms to modify remodeling rather than myocyte regeneration. The role of myofibroblasts and the optimal conditions of cell application need to be determined to translate these mechanisms into functional improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rabald et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: