Why the study?
Does TAK-044 initiated immediately after myocardial infarction improve survival and left ventricular remodeling in rats?
Does TAK-044 initiated immediately after myocardial infarction improve survival and left ventricular remodeling in rats?
Initiating nonselective endothelin receptor blockade immediately after myocardial infarction may worsen acute survival and left ventricular remodeling.
May worsen acute survival and LV remodeling with immediate post-MI nonselective ET blockade in rats; leaves open translation to other models or timing.
To investigate the effects of endothelin blockade initiated immediately after the onset of myocardial infarction on survival and left ventricular remodeling, treatment with the nonselective receptor antagonist TAK-044 (n = 22) or saline (n = 19) for 3 weeks was initiated immediately after coronary ligation in rats. The 24-h survival rate was significantly lower in the TAK-044 group than in the saline group. The systolic blood pressure 24 h after the onset of myocardial infarction was similar in the saline and TAK-044 groups, although it was significantly lower in the TAK-044 group during the 3-week protocol. Heart weight/tibial length was significantly increased in the TAK-044 group compared with the saline group. As all deaths in the TAK-044 group occurred within 24 h after myocardial infarction, we performed additional experiments using a separate group of rats 12-16 h after myocardial infarction. Plasma and myocardial endothelin-1 levels were significantly increased, and a bolus injection of TAK-044 significantly reduced left ventricular dP/dtmax in these rats that had had a myocardial infarction compared with sham-operated rats. Endothelin receptor blockade initiated immediately after the onset of myocardial infarction may deteriorate acute-phase survival and left ventricular remodeling. Inhibition of the positive inotropic action of endothlin-1 may partially explain the increased 24-h mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takahashi et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: