Mibefradil blocks L- and T-type calcium currents in canine Purkinje myocytes but does not affect normal or abnormal automaticity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mibefradil blocks L/T-type Ca currents without suppressing Purkinje automaticity; challenges Ca-dependent pacemaking assumptions and leaves mechanisms open for further study.
INTRODUCTION: We studied the effects of mibefradil (MIB), a nondihydropyridine T-type Ca2+ channel antagonist, on T- and L-type Ca2+ (I(CaT), I(CaL)) currents in Purkinje myocytes dispersed from the subendocardium of the left ventricle of normal (NZPC) and 48-hour infarcted (IZPC) hearts. METHODS AND RESULTS: Currents were recorded with Cs+- and EGTA-rich pipettes and in Na+-K+-free external solutions to eliminate overlapping currents. In all cells, I(Ca) was reduced by MIB (0.1 to 10 microM). No change in the time course of decay of peak I(Ca) was noted. Average peak T/L ratio decreased in NZPCs but not IZPCs with 1 microM MIB. Steady-state availability of I(CaL) was altered with 1 microM MIB in both cell types (mean +/- SEM) (V0.5 = -22 +/- 4 mV for NZPC and -25 +/- 5 mV for IZPC before drug; -63 +/- 9 mV for NZPC and -67 +/- 6 mV for IZPC after drug; P < 0.05). For I(CaT), V0.5 (-50 +/- 3 mV for NZPC and -52 +/- 1 mV for IZPC before drug) shifted to -60 +/- 2 mV (NZPC) and -62 +/- 3 mV (IZPC) (P < 0.05) after drug. We also determined the effects of MIB on spontaneously beating Purkinje normal fibers and on depolarized abnormally automatic fibers from the infarcted heart using standard microelectrode techniques. When NZPC and IZPC fibers were superfused with [K+]o = 2.7 mM, MIB 3 microM and 10 microM had no effect on rate or the maximum diastolic potential, but action potential plateau shifted to more negative values, the slope of repolarization phase 3 decreased, and action potential duration increased. CONCLUSION: MIB blocks L- and T-type Ca2+ currents in Purkinje myocytes but lacks an effect on either normal or abnormal automaticity in Purkinje fibers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pinto et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: