Why the study?
Does the use of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic heart failure?
Does the use of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic heart failure?
This review highlights the expanding indications and supporting evidence for NOAC use in patients with concurrent atrial fibrillation and heart failure.
AF-HF reciprocity worsens prognosis; supports NOAC use yet leaves open HF-specific trials.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review seeks to provide an evidence-based update on the issue of atrial fibrillation and chronic heart failure with an emphasis on anticoagulation and the expanding use of the novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs). RECENT FINDINGS: There is an increasing appreciation of the important reciprocal relationship between atrial fibrillation and heart failure and the negative prognostic impact that each condition has on the other. There are now four NOACs approved for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. There are increasing data to support their use in atrial fibrillation with heart failure, including in patients with nonmechanical or rheumatic valvular disease, and to facilitate direct current cardioversion. The choice of NOAC is heavily dependent on individual patient characteristics. SUMMARY: The use of and indications for NOACs for patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation are rapidly increasing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boos et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: