Why the study?
Intra-cavitary LV thrombus is a relative contraindication to LVAD implantation due to increased thromboembolic risks, prompting evaluation of outcomes in this population.
Does LVAD implantation in patients with preoperative LV-thrombus result in similar 30-day survival free of stroke and pump thrombosis compared to patients without LV-thrombus?
Does LVAD implantation in patients with preoperative LV-thrombus result in similar 30-day survival free of stroke and pump thrombosis compared to patients without LV-thrombus?
LVAD implantation in patients with preoperative LV-thrombus is safe and feasible, showing similar 30-day outcomes compared to patients without LV-thrombus when managed with correct diagnostic and intraoperative strategies.
LVAD implantation despite preoperative LV thrombus appears feasible with comparable short-term outcomes; leaves open need for prospective validation.
An intra-cavitary left ventricular (LV) thrombus is a relative contraindication to LV assist device (LVAD) implantation based on increased thromboembolic risks. Herein, we present our experience with LVAD patients with or without preoperative diagnosis of LV-thrombus. We retrospectively investigated 563 patients who received LVAD implantation between 2004 and 2018. Diagnosis of LV-thrombus was verified with computed tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, or intraoperative LV inspection. The primary endpoint was 30-day survival free of stroke and pump thrombosis. Overall, 72 patients (12.8%) had a diagnosis of LV-thrombus. They were younger (51 years; IQR:41-59), affected by severely reduced ejection fraction (15%; IQR:10-20), more often presenting with dilated cardiomyopathy (61.8%) and INTERMACS profile 1 (33.3%). Preoperative atrial fibrillation was frequent in patients without LV-thrombus (38.9%). Conventional sternotomy was the preferred approach in LV-thrombus patients (77.8%), based on more HMII implantations in these patients (41.7%). Survival free of strokes and pump thrombosis at 30 days was comparable (P = .5751) between patients with (83.3%) or without LV-thrombus (80.9%). LVAD implantation in patients with preoperative LV-thrombus is safe and feasible. When managed through correct diagnostic and intraoperative strategies including accurate inspection of the LV cavity, these patients show similar 30-day outcomes compared to patients without LV-thrombus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doğan et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: