Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present paper investigates Arabic lexical borrowings in terms of the new signifieds accrued in the receptor language (English) drawing on Venuti’s (1998) notions of ‘domestication’ and ‘foreignization’. The paper shows that SL meanings are at loggerheads with those in the receptor language. The paper argues that lexical borrowings are consequence of cultural transfer in intercultural communication situations and they can be a double-edged sword. Whilst the shift from the original meaning(s) via borrowing may be considered a gain for the receptor language, it can do injustice to the source language.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammad Ahmad Thawabteh (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: