The expression pattern of pathogenesis-related genes PR-1 to PR-5 was examined in the roots and leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana plants on infection with beet-cyst (Heterodera schachtii) and root-knot (Meloidogyne incognita) nematodes. During H. schachtii parasitism of Arabidopsis, the expression of PR-1, PR-2 and PR-5, which are considered to be markers for salicylic acid (SA)-dependent systemic acquired resistance (SAR), was induced in both roots and leaves of infected plants. In addition, the expression of PR-3 and PR-4, which are used as markers for jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent SAR, was not altered in roots, but in the leaves of H. schachtii-infected plants, the expression PR-3 was induced, whereas the expression of PR-4 was down-regulated. During M. incognita infection of Arabidopsis, the expression of PR-1, PR-2 and PR-5 was highly induced in roots, as was PR-3 to a lesser extent, but the expression of PR-4 was not altered, indicating that infection with M. incognita activated both SA- and JA-dependent SAR in roots. However, all PRgenes examined (PR-1 to PR-5) were down-regulated in the leaves of M. incognita-infected plants, suggesting the suppression of both SA- and JA-dependent SAR. Furthermore, constitutive expression of a single PR in Arabidopsis altered the transcription patterns of other PR genes, and the over-expression of PR-1 reduced successful infection by both H. schachtii and M. incognita, whereas the over-expression of PR-3 reduced host susceptibility to M. incognita but had no effect on H. schachtii parasitism. The results suggest that fundamental differences in the mechanisms of infection by beet-cyst and root-knot nematodes differentially regulate PR protein production and mobilization within susceptible host plants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamamouch et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: