Why the study?
The study was designed to enable T1 mapping of the myocardium within 2.3 s for a 2D slice utilizing cardiac motion-corrected, model-based image reconstruction.
A novel motion-corrected model-based reconstruction allows for accurate 2D myocardial T1 mapping in just 2.3 seconds, significantly reducing scan time compared to standard cardiac-gated approaches.
Enables rapid free-breathing myocardial T1 mapping; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
PURPOSE: To allow for T1 mapping of the myocardium within 2.3 s for a 2D slice utilizing cardiac motion-corrected, model-based image reconstruction. METHODS: Golden radial data acquisition is continuously carried out for 2.3 s after an inversion pulse. In a first step, dynamic images are reconstructed which show both contrast changes due to T1 recovery and anatomical changes due to the heartbeat. An image registration algorithm with a signal model for T1 recovery is applied to estimate non-rigid cardiac motion. In a second step, estimated motion fields are applied during an iterative model-based T1 reconstruction. The approach was evaluated in numerical simulations, phantom experiments and in in-vivo scans in healthy volunteers. RESULTS: The accuracy of cardiac motion estimation was shown in numerical simulations with an average motion field error of 0.7 ± 0.6 mm for a motion amplitude of 5.1 mm. The accuracy of T1 estimation was demonstrated in phantom experiments, with no significant difference (p = 0.13) in T1 estimated by the proposed approach compared to an inversion-recovery reference method. In vivo, the proposed approach yielded 1.3 × 1.3 mm T1 maps with no significant difference (p = 0.77) in T1 and SDs in comparison to a cardiac-gated approach requiring 16 s scan time (i.e., seven times longer than the proposed approach). Cardiac motion correction improved the precision of T1 maps, shown by a 40% reduced SD. CONCLUSION: We have presented an approach that provides T1 maps of the myocardium in 2.3 s by utilizing both cardiac motion correction and model-based T1 reconstruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerkering et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: