Why the study?
Do E(LV)I reserve and VAC reserve during stress echocardiography predict death and heart failure hospitalization in patients with negative stress echocardiography?
Do E(LV)I reserve and VAC reserve during stress echocardiography predict death and heart failure hospitalization in patients with negative stress echocardiography?
Assessment of E(LV)I and VAC reserve during stress echocardiography can identify patients at risk for adverse outcomes despite a negative stress echo result.
May stratify risk after negative stress echocardiography; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: A maximal negative stress echo identifies a low-risk subset for coronary events. However, the potentially prognostically relevant information on cardiovascular hemodynamics for heart-failure-related events is unsettled. Aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of stress-induced variation in cardiovascular hemodynamics in patients with negative stress echocardiography. METHODS: We enrolled 891 patients (593 males mean age 63 ± 12, ejection fraction 48 ± 17%), with negative (exercise 172, dipyridamole 482, and dobutamine 237) stress echocardiography result. During stress we assessed left ventricular end-systolic elastance index (E(LV)I), ventricular arterial coupling (VAC) indexed by the ratio of the E(LV)I to arterial elastance index (E aI), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and pressure-volume area (PVA). Changes from rest to peak stress (reserve) were tested as predictors of main outcome measures: combined death and heart failure hospitalization. RESULTS: During a median followup of 19 months (interquartile range 8-36), 50 deaths and 84 hospitalization occurred. Receiver-operating-characteristic curves identified as best predictors E(LV)I reserve for exercise (AUC = 0.871) and dobutamine (AUC = 0.848) and VAC reserve (AUC = 0.696) for dipyridamole. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with negative stress echocardiography may experience an adverse outcome, which can be identified by assessment of E(LV)I reserve and VAC reserve during stress echo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bombardini et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: