Why the study?
Achieving complete coronary revascularization can be challenging, and this study aimed to assess the prognostic usefulness of the Syntax Revascularization Index (SRI) in patients undergoing PCI.
Does reasonable incomplete revascularization (SRI ≥ 75%) provide similar 1-year clinical outcomes compared to complete revascularization in all-comer patients undergoing PCI?
Does reasonable incomplete revascularization (SRI ≥ 75%) provide similar 1-year clinical outcomes compared to complete revascularization in all-comer patients undergoing PCI?
Achieving a Syntax Revascularization Index (SRI) ≥ 75% represents a reasonable target for percutaneous coronary intervention when complete revascularization is not achievable, yielding comparable mid-term outcomes in high-risk subgroups.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SRI ≥75% may mark reasonable incomplete revascularization in all-comers PCI; leaves open whether this threshold improves outcomes prospectively.
In particular settings, achieving complete coronary revascularization could be very challenging. The Syntax Revascularization Index (SRI) represents a useful tool to assess the degree of coronary revascularization in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to assess the prognostic usefulness of the SRI in an
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hatem et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: