Why the study?
Brown fat uptake of 18F-FDG presents challenges in interpreting PET scans for pediatric cancer patients, and there is no clear consensus on best practices to suppress it.
Clinical practices to mitigate brown fat uptake on pediatric 18F-FDG PET vary widely, with environmental interventions not universally reported and pharmacologic agents used by less than a third of institutions.
Variable brown fat suppression practices reported in FDG-PET; leaves open need for standardized, evidence-based protocols.
Brown fat can present challenges in patients with cancer who undergo ¹⁸F-FDG PET scans. Uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG by brown fat can obscure or appear similar to active oncologic lesions, causing clinical challenges in PET interpretation. Small, retrospective studies have reported environmental and pharmacologic interventions for suppressing brown fat uptake on PET; however, there is no clear consensus on best practices. We sought to characterize practice patterns for strategies to mitigate brown fat uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG during PET scanning. Methods: A survey was developed and distributed via e-mail LISTSERV to members of the Children’s Oncology Group diagnostic imaging committee, the Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging pediatric imaging council, and the Society of Chiefs of Radiology at Children’s Hospitals between April 2022 and February 2023. Responses were stored anonymously in REDCap, aggregated, and summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: Fifty-five complete responses were submitted: 51 (93%) faculty and fellow-level physicians, 2 (4%) technologists, and 2 (4%) respondents not reporting their rank. There were 43 unique institutions represented, including 5 (12%) outside the United States. Thirty-eight of 41 (93%) institutions that responded on environmental interventions reported using warm blankets in the infusion and scanning rooms. Less than a third (n = 13, 30%) of institutions reported use of a pharmacologic intervention, with propranolol (n = 5, 38%) being most common, followed by fentanyl (n = 4, 31%), diazepam (n = 2, 15%), and diazepam plus propranolol (n = 2, 15%). Selection criteria for pharmacologic intervention varied, with the most common criterion being brown fat uptake on a prior scan (n = 6, 45%). Conclusion: Clinical practices to mitigate brown fat uptake on pediatric ¹⁸F-FDG PET vary widely. Simple environmental interventions including warm blankets or increasing the temperature of the injection and scanning rooms were not universally reported. Less than a third of institutions use pharmacologic agents for brown fat mitigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaylord et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: