Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To investigate the incidence of latanoprost-related adverse events of the cornea, iris, and retina and the occurrence of hyperpigmentation. METHODS: An open-label safety surveillance study was conducted in 14 countries. Patients on intraocular pressure (IOP)-reducing therapy other than latanoprost were eligible if they required a change in therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to latanoprost administered once daily or to usual care (any other commercially available medication). Patients were examined at baseline and every 6 months for 5 years. RESULTS: In all, 5854 patients were included (latanoprost, 3936; usual care, 1918). Of those initially randomized to latanoprost, 2707 (68.8%) completed the study, and 4638 (79.2%) patients received at least one dose of latanoprost. Five-year risks were < or = 3.17% for new occurrences of corneal erosions, iritis/uveitis, or macular edema in both randomization groups. Serious adverse drug reactions were reported in 17/3936 (0.43%) latanoprost and 9/1918 (0.47%) usual care patients. In all, 87.6% of patients ever treated with latanoprost had no increased iris pigmentation; no serious adverse drug reactions were reported in patients with increased iris pigmentation. CONCLUSIONS: This 5-year study suggests that latanoprost as prescribed in 14 countries is a safe long-term treatment for patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldberg et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: