Why the study?
Does the use of different reliable change indices (RCIs) with correction for practice effects alter the detection of post-operative cognitive dysfunction in patients undergoing CABG compared to standard RCI?
Population
160 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and a comparable healthy non-surgical control…
Comparison
Three reliable change index rules incorporating… vs Standard RCI with no correction for practice
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
1 week post-operatively
Authors
Loading...
Similar POCD rates across RCIs post-CABG; supports within-subject SD preference but leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
Does the use of different reliable change indices (RCIs) with correction for practice effects alter the detection of post-operative cognitive dysfunction in patients undergoing CABG compared to standard RCI?
Different reliable change indices identify post-operative cognitive dysfunction in a similar proportion of CABG patients, though using within-subject standard deviation is theoretically more appropriate when correcting for practice effects.
LEWIS et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: