Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the three-dimensional (3D) accuracy of component positioning in image-free robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (ra-TKA) by comparing intra-operative robotic plans with post-operative computed tomography (CT)-based measurements and to clinically validate the accuracy of posterior femoral condylar reproduction. Methods Seventy-three consecutive varus knees (mean patient age 73 ± 6 years) underwent ra-TKA using NAVIO or CORI system with the JOURNEY II implant. Posterior femoral condylar accuracy was assessed by comparing planned and achieved resection thickness using a caliper. Post-operative component positions were evaluated using CT-based 3D–3D matching in an anatomical coordinate system, and direction-specific differences from the intra-operative plan were analyzed. Results Posterior femoral condylar resection showed small errors (0.9 ± 1.0 mm medial, 0.8 ± 0.7 mm lateral). Directional component position differences for the femur were −0.2 ± 1.6° (coronal), −2.2 ± 1.8° (sagittal), and 0.6 ± 1.9° (rotational). For the tibia, directional differences were −0.3 ± 1.0° (coronal), −1.3 ± 1.5° (sagittal), and −7.9 ± 6.3° (rotational). Absolute differences were 1.2 ± 1.0°, 2.2 ± 1.6°, and 1.6 ± 1.3° for femoral components and 0.7 ± 0.7°, 1.6 ± 1.2°, and 8.6 ± 5.1° for tibial components in the coronal, sagittal, and rotational planes. Conclusions Image-free ra-TKA demonstrated clinically acceptable posterior condylar accuracy and direction-specific positional differences between intra-operative planning and post-operative measurements. These differences may reflect surgical accuracy, coordinate system discrepancies, and variability in intra-operative surgical procedures, rather than surgical error alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mochizuki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: