Why the study?
The authors sought to evaluate the relationship between clinical assessment and echocardiographic evaluation across Stevenson presentation categories in patients with AHF.
Does early echocardiographic examination recognize different phenotypes and improve risk stratification in patients with acute heart failure classified by the Stevenson criteria?
Does early echocardiographic examination recognize different phenotypes and improve risk stratification in patients with acute heart failure classified by the Stevenson criteria?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early echocardiographic assessment in acute heart failure reveals that a significant percentage of clinically 'dry' patients have echocardiographic signs of congestion, suggesting that combined clinical and echocardiographic evaluation better defines patient profiles and prognosis.
Background Acute heart failure (AHF) presentation is universally classified in relation to the presence or absence of congestion and the peripheral perfusion condition according to the Stevenson diagram. We sought to evaluate a relationship existing between clinical assessment and echocardiographic evaluation in patients with AHF. Materials and methods This is a retrospective blinded multicenter analysis assessing both clinical and echocardiographic analyses during the early hospital admission for AHF. Patients were categorized into four groups according to the Stevenson presentation: group A (warm and dry), group B (cold and dry), group C (warm and wet), and group D (cold and wet). Echocardiographic evaluation was executed within 12 h from the first clinical evaluation. The following parameters were measured: left ventricular (LV) volumes, LV ejection fraction (LVEF); pattern Doppler by E/e1 ratio, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and inferior cave vein diameter (ICV). Results We studied 208 patients, 10 in group A, 16 in group B, 153 in group C, and 29 in group D. Median age of our sample was 81 [69–86] years and the patients enrolled were mainly men (66.8%). Patients in groups C and A showed significant higher levels of systolic arterial pressures with respect to groups B and D (respectively, 130 [115–145] mmHg vs. 122 [119–130] mmHg vs. 92 [90–100] mmHg vs. 95 [90–100] mmHg, p < 0.001). Patients in groups A and C (warm) demonstrated significant higher values of LVEF with respect to patients in groups B and D (43 [34–49] vs. 42 [30–49] vs. 27 [15–31] vs. 30 [22–42]%, p < 0.001). Whereas group B experienced significant lower TAPSE values compared with other group (14 [12–17] mm vs. A: 17 [16–21] mm vs. C: 18 [14–20] mm vs. D: 16 [12–17] mm; p = 0.02). Finally, echocardiographic congestion score including PASP ≥ 40 mmHg, ICV ≥ 21, mm and E/e’ > 14 did not differ among groups. Follow-up analysis showed an increased mortality rate in D group (HR 8.2 p < 0.04). Conclusion The early Stevenson classification remains a simple and universally recognized approach for the detection of congestion and perfusion status. The combined clinical and echocardiographic assessment may be useful to better define the patients’ profile.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palazzuoli et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: