Why the study?
Does an automated CAD system accurately compute the axial RV/LV diameter ratio and predict 30-day mortality or need for intensive therapies in patients with acute PE compared to manual radiologist measurements?
Does an automated CAD system accurately compute the axial RV/LV diameter ratio and predict 30-day mortality or need for intensive therapies in patients with acute PE compared to manual radiologist measurements?
An automated CAD system can accurately compute the axial RV/LV diameter ratio from CTPA images, providing a reproducible prognostic biomarker for acute PE that performs similarly to manual radiologist measurements.
RV/LV ratio on CTPA may refine acute PE risk stratification; leaves open standardization and routine adoption.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Right Ventricular to Left Ventricular (RV/LV) diameter ratio has been shown to be a prognostic biomarker for patients suffering from acute Pulmonary Embolism (PE). While Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) images used to confirm a clinical suspicion of PE do include information of the heart, a numerical RV/LV diameter ratio is not universally reported, likely because of lack in training, inter-reader variability in the measurements, and additional effort by the radiologist. This study designs and validates a completely automated Computer Aided Detection (CAD) system to compute the axial RV/LV diameter ratio from CTPA images so that the RV/LV diameter ratio can be a more objective metric that is consistently reported in patients for whom CTPA diagnoses PE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CAD system was designed specifically for RV/LV measurements. The system was tested in 198 consecutive CTPA patients with acute PE. Its accuracy was evaluated using reference standard RV/LV radiologist measurements and its prognostic value was established for 30-day PE-specific mortality and a composite outcome of 30-day PE-specific mortality or the need for intensive therapies. The study was Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved and HIPAA compliant. RESULTS: The CAD system analyzed correctly 92.4% (183/198) of CTPA studies. The mean difference between automated and manually computed axial RV/LV ratios was 0.03±0.22. The correlation between the RV/LV diameter ratio obtained by the CAD system and that obtained by the radiologist was high (r=0.81). Compared to the radiologist, the CAD system equally achieved high accuracy for the composite outcome, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.75 vs. 0.78. Similar results were found for 30-days PE-specific mortality, with areas under the curve of 0.72 vs. 0.75. CONCLUSIONS: An automated CAD system for determining the CT derived RV/LV diameter ratio in patients with acute PE has high accuracy when compared to manual measurements and similar prognostic significance for two clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
González et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: