This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To carry out comparison of apical root resorption (ARR) in the fixed orthodontic appliance and clear aligners with the help of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. METHODS AND MATERIALS: test and Chi-square test to compare ARR between the two groups. CONCLUSION: From the present study, it can be concluded that the amount of resorption at the root apex is less among patients who undergo treatment using clear aligners as compared with those treated with conventional fixed orthodontics appliances. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: ARR found in the orthodontic treatment is a process that causes loss of hard dental tissues such as dentine and cementum at the root apex. Fixed orthodontic appliances are most common method of orthodontic treatment. However, clear aligners are also used commonly for orthodontic treatment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LNU et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: