Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Autism has long been viewed as a disorder characterized by persistent deficits in need of a cure. This medical or pathologizing perspective has been confronted by a social model of disability, which places the burden of the challenges faced by the autistic community on society's failure to accommodate neurological differences. A more nuanced, interactionist model suggests that disability arises from a poor fit between personal characteristics and environmental demands. As part of a mixed-method study on terminology pertaining to autism and related concepts, 14 French-speaking autistic adults from Quebec participated in semistructured interviews. They were asked their definitions of autism, the concept of disability, and whether autism is a disability. Qualitative analyses revealed that respondents were prone to view autism through the lens of a social model of disability. Autism was defined as a neurological difference rather than a mental illness. Although many conceptualized disability as a personal limitation, they were reluctant to label their diagnosis of autism as a disability. The difficulties they face stem from “disabling situations” due to environments and social norms tailored to a neurotypical majority of people. This aligns with the neurodiversity movement, which advocates social change while also recognizing the support needs of autistic individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Normand et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: