Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this article, I argue that the university needs to be understood as an ‘imagined other’ in constructing collaborative community literacy research. This a realization that the area of study that universities research is not always is necessary in communities. There is a dialogic relationship between and communities that can be positive and but at the same time, it can also conflict. As difficult as it might be, conflict can be generative and can new insights. Drawing on research experience from a number of studies of practices in one community, I explore ways in which research processes can reflected upon collaboratively and I suggest methodologies that allow for and unknowing in order to make sense of this process. I argue that collaborative ethnography together with methodologies from arts practice be helpful in grounding collaborative research within epistemologies of and hope.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kate Pahl (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: