Alkaline phosphatase of intestinal origin hydrolyzed the S-substituted monoesters of phosphorothioic acid of the type RSPO3Na2 (R = —CH2CH2NH2, —CH2CH2NHCOCH3, —CH2COO, or —CH2CH2COOC2H5) at the S—P bond to yield orthophosphate and the corresponding thioalcohols. The rate of enzymic hydrolysis of cysteamine S-phosphate was measured at pH 9.0 in 0.1 n sodium barbital buffer at different concentrations of substrate and MgCl2. The Km and Vmax values obtained, as well as the amount of MgCl2 required for complete activation of the enzyme, were similar to the corresponding values obtained when p-nitrophenyl phosphate was used as the substrate. In marked contrast, however, O-substituted monoesters of phosphorothioic acid of the type ROPO2SKH (R = —CH3, —CH2CH3, or [See PDF for structure]NO2) were completely resistant to hydrolysis by alkaline phosphatases from Escherichia coli and from intestine. The O-substituted monoesters of thiophosphoric acid (10-7 m) inhibited the enzymic hydrolysis of both cysteamine S-phosphate and p-nitrophenyl phosphate (10-3 m) at a 10-fold concentration of the enzyme. Acid phosphatases from wheat germ, potato, and prostate gland did not hydrolyze S-substituted monoesters of phosphorothioic acid at detectable rates, but did hydrolyze O-substituted monoesters of phosphorothioic acid at rates comparable with those obtained when p-nitrophenyl phosphate served as the substrate for these enzymes. These findings suggest that acid and alkaline phosphatases act by two different mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
H. Neumann (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: