Inhibition of nitric oxide synthase by L-NAME in rats increases blood pressure and is associated with enhanced expression of Gi proteins and altered adenylyl cyclase signaling in the heart.
Animal data on L-NAME hypertension should not change practice; leaves open Gi protein roles in human cardiac NO signaling.
Nitric oxide (NO) has been shown to regulate a variety of physiological functions, including vascular tone. The inhibition of NO synthase by N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) has been reported to increase arterial blood pressure. The present studies were undertaken to investigate if the increased blood pressure by L-NAME is associated with enhanced expression of Gi proteins, implicated in the pathogenesis of hypertension. L-NAME was administered orally into Sprague-Dawley rats for a period of 4 weeks. Control rats were given plain tap water only. The systolic blood pressure was enhanced in L-NAME-treated rats as compared with control rats; however, the heart-to-body weight ratio was not different in the two groups. The levels of Gialpha-2 and Gialpha-3 proteins and their mRNA as determined by western and northern blotting, respectively, were significantly augmented in hearts from L-NAME-treated rats, whereas the levels of Gsalpha and Gbeta were unaltered. In addition, the effect of low concentrations of GTPgammaS on forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity (receptor-independent functions of Gialpha) was significantly enhanced, whereas the receptor-dependent inhibitions of adenylyl cyclase were completely attenuated in L-NAME-treated rats. Whereas cholera toxin-mediated stimulation of adenylyl cyclase was unaltered in both group of rats, the stimulatory effects of some agonists on adenylyl cyclase activity were diminished in L-NAME-treated rats. These results suggest the implication of NO in the modulation of Gi protein expression and associated adenylyl cyclase signaling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anand‐Srivastava et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: