Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 4, 2019International Journal of Molecular SciencesOpen Access

Current Understanding of Residual Force Enhancement: Cross-Bridge Component and Non-Cross-Bridge Component

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Residual force enhancement cannot be explained by the cross-bridge theory, prompting alternative proposed mechanisms whose unresolved problems require clarification.

Design

Review

Authors

AFAtsuki FukutaniRitsumeikan UniversityWHWalter HerzogHeart Failure & Transplant

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Some observations defy cross-bridge theory; leaves open need for refined models in muscle mechanics research.

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Fukutani et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7679efa0847c3df1ec0959https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215479
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Structure of the actin-myosin complex and its implications for muscle contraction1993 · 1,824 citations
  2. 2Why are muscles strong, and why do they require little energy in eccentric action?2018 · 90 citations
  3. 3The role of sarcomere length non-uniformities in residual force enhancement of skeletal muscle myofibrils2016 · 53 citations
  4. 4Differences in titin segmental elongation between passive and active stretch in skeletal muscle2017 · 39 citations
  5. 5A Novel Three-Filament Model of Force Generation in Eccentric Contraction of Skeletal Muscles2015 · 123 citations