Why the study?
TRAPP repair aims to address traditional annuloplasty shortcomings in functional tricuspid regurgitation, but optimal patch width has not been identified.
What is the optimal patch width for tricuspid anteroposterior patch (TRAPP) repair to maximize coaptation and avoid abnormal leaflet geometry in an ex vivo model?
What is the optimal patch width for tricuspid anteroposterior patch (TRAPP) repair to maximize coaptation and avoid abnormal leaflet geometry in an ex vivo model?
An ex vivo porcine model demonstrates that a 1.5 cm patch is optimal for TRAPP repair, maximizing coaptation while preventing abnormal systolic leaflet geometry.
TRAPP patch width optimization in ex vivo porcine model is hypothesis-generating; leaves open ideal dimensions for clinical tricuspid repair.
Background: Tricuspid anteroposterior patch (TRAPP) repair aims to address shortcomings of traditional annuloplasty in functional tricuspid regurgitation by selectively enlarging and translocating the anterior and posterior leaflets, but optimal patch width has not been identified. Methods: An ex vivo model of the tricuspid valve was established in fresh porcine hearts by pneumatic pressurization of the ventricles. TRAPP repair was performed with patches of varying width (group 1, 1.0 cm; group 2, 1.5 cm; group 3, 2.0 cm). A 3-dimensional structured light scanner was used to image the topography of the tricuspid valve before and after TRAPP repair, and measurements were compared. Coaptation increases in length and area were similar in groups 2 and 3, but the larger patch size of group 3 caused bulging above the annulus and significant changes in leaflet measurements. Conclusions: Optimal patch size for TRAPP repair is 1.5 cm. This patch size maximally increased coaptation length but avoided abnormal systolic leaflet geometry (bulging) seen with the larger patch.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Larson et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: