Why the study?
Does a formal pharmaceutical care plan improve cholesterol reduction and goal achievement in elderly hypercholesterolemic veterans treated with colestipol?
Does a formal pharmaceutical care plan improve cholesterol reduction and goal achievement in elderly hypercholesterolemic veterans treated with colestipol?
Pharmacist-physician co-management significantly improves lipid-lowering efficacy and goal attainment in patients treated with colestipol.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pharmaceutical care was associated with higher LDL-C goal attainment in veterans; leaves open whether pharmacist co-management warrants broader adoption without RCTs.
We conducted a prospective trial to determine whether a formal, integrated pharmaceutical care plan can enhance patient acceptance and compliance with colestipol therapy and improve outcomes. Forty patients with hypercholesterolemia were equally divided and assigned to either a usual care or pharmaceutical care group. In the pharmaceutical care group compared with the usual care group, after 52 weeks, colestipol therapy resulted in a greater reduction in total cholesterol (12.5% vs 7.3%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; 16% vs 9.4%), and LDL-C:high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (24.4% vs 12.2%, p < 0.05). The percentage of patients who achieved their LDL-C goal at week 52 was much greater in the pharmaceutical care group (29.4%) than in the usual care group (5.0%, p < 0.05). Co-management by a physician and a pharmacist of hypercholesterolemic veterans treated with colestipol can enhance patient acceptance of the drug, LDL-C reduction, and achievement of therapeutic goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Konzem et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: