Why the study?
Differences in primary cardiovascular outcomes between the landmark EMPEROR-Preserved and DELIVER trials were observed when stratified by Asian subgroups.
Does dapagliflozin compared to empagliflozin improve the composite of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization in adults with HFpEF?
Does dapagliflozin compared to empagliflozin improve the composite of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization in adults with HFpEF?
This small cohort study found no significant overall difference between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin for cardiovascular outcomes in HFpEF, highlighting the need for larger comparative effectiveness studies.
May limit direct SGLT2i comparisons in HFpEF; leaves open need for head-to-head trials.
Background: Sodium–Glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, such as dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, are commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Recent landmark trials, EMPEROR-Preserved and DELIVER, have demonstrated that both drugs can improve cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, differences in the primary outcomes between these trials were observed when stratified by Asian subgroups. Methods: This study analyzed data from 59 adults using empagliflozin and 26 using dapagliflozin at Princess Margaret Hospital between August 2016 and March 2022. The primary composite outcome was combined cardiovascular death and hospitalization due to heart failure. Results were stratified using a Cox proportional-hazards model. Furthermore, the occurrence of side effects was evaluated and reported as safety outcomes. Results: The study found that the cardiovascular and mortality outcomes were higher than previously reported in the literature. The use of empagliflozin resulted in 24.9 composite outcome events per 100 patient years, whereas the use of dapagliflozin resulted in 29.9 events per 100 patient years. Patients taking empagliflozin without heart failure hospitalization in the past 12 months had significantly better composite outcomes than those taking dapagliflozin (hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.12–0.76). However, no significant differences were observed in the composite outcome and all-cause mortality between the two drugs. Conclusion: A substantial initial decrease in overall survival toward the primary composite outcome within the first year after the start of SGLT-2 inhibitor administration indicates the need for early intervention for this specific patient subgroup. Although constrained by a modest sample size obtained from a single center, the findings of this study highlight the importance of conducting additional research to explore the comparative efficacy of SGLT-2 inhibitors for HFpEF in a larger local population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tam et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: