Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Abstract 1 This research was conducted at the Aspen FACE (Free Air CO 2 Enrichment) site located in northern Wisconsin, U.S.A. where trembling aspen ( Populus tremuloides Michaux) trees were exposed to one of four atmospheric treatments: elevated carbon dioxide (CO 2 ; 560 µL/L), elevated ozone (O 3 ; ambient × 1.5), elevated CO 2 and O 3 , or ambient air. We evaluated the effects of these fumigants on aspen foliar quality and the performance of aspen blotch leafminer ( Phyllonorycter tremuloidiella Braun). 2 CO 2 and O 3 each affected foliar quality, with the major changes consisting of an 11% reduction in nitrogen under elevated CO 2 and a 20% reduction in tremulacin under elevated O 3 . In the CO 2 + O 3 treatment, nitrogen levels were reduced by 15% and CO 2 ameliorated the O 3 ‐mediated reduction in tremulacin levels. 3 Phyllonorycter tremuloidiella were allowed to colonize trees naturally. Elevated CO 2 and O 3 reduced colonization rates by 42 and 49% relative to ambient CO 2 and O 3 , respectively. The only effect of fumigation treatments on larval performance occurred under elevated O 3 , where male development time and larval consumption increased by 8 and 28%, respectively, over insects reared under ambient O 3 . 4 These data demonstrate that the individual and combined effects of CO 2 and O 3 can alter aspen foliar chemistry and that these alterations in foliar chemistry produce little to no change in larval performance. However, both CO 2 and O 3 greatly reduced oviposition. In order to ascertain the full effects of CO 2 and O 3 on insect performance, future studies should address both population‐ and individual‐level characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kopper et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: