Why the study?
Does admission in a later era with higher use of evidence-based treatments and revascularisation improve long-term survival in 28-day survivors of acute myocardial infarction compared to an earlier era?
Population
4,451 consecutive patients alive 28 days after a definite acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospital…
Comparison
Admission during the 1991-1993 era. vs Admission during the 1984-1987 era.
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
12 years
Authors
Loading...
Mortality gains in later-era post-MI survivors were explained by treatments and revascularisation; extends observational evidence but leaves causality open.
Does admission in a later era with higher use of evidence-based treatments and revascularisation improve long-term survival in 28-day survivors of acute myocardial infarction compared to an earlier era?
Progressive adoption of evidence-based medical treatments and coronary revascularization is associated with significant improvements in 12-year survival following acute myocardial infarction.
Briffa et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: