Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An exonuclease has been partially purified from XP-12-infected Xanthomonas oryzae which is not found in uninfected X. oryzae. Although both the phage-induced exonuclease and the major host exonucleolytic DNase released 5'-mononucleotides, these enzymes differed in their chromatographic behavior, pH optimum, salt inhibition, and heat sensitivity. These two exonucleases preferred different substrates. Nicked native DNA was the best substrate for the phage-induced enzyme, whereas denatured DNA was the best substrate for the host enzyme. Also, the host enzyme had a significant preference for denatured or nicked, normal cytosine-containing DNA (e.g., X. oryzae or T7 DNA) over similarly denatured or nicked 5-methylcytosine-rich DNA (namely, XP-12DNA), whereas the phage-induced enzyme hydrolyzed both types of DNA equally well.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farber et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: