Why the study?
Rotator cuff tears frequently progress and develop symptoms, but the location of tear initiation and subsequent biomechanical changes as a function of tear size were not fully determined.
In a cadaveric model, rotator cuff tear initiation occurs further posterior than previously believed, and significant biomechanical deterioration occurs as tears progress beyond 100 mm².
Cadaveric data on supraspinatus tear sites and biomechanics may guide modeling; leaves open in vivo validation before clinical use.
Rotator cuff tears are one of the most common tendinous injuries in the adult population, resulting in pain and loss of function. While many tears are often asymptomatic, many patients will experience tears progression and the development of symptoms. The objective of this study is to determine the location of rotator cuff (RC) tear initiation and the subsequent biomechanical changes as a function of tear size. Eight fresh-frozen (n=8) human cadaveric supraspinatus tendons (mean age: 68.6 ± 14.2) were subjected to fatigue loading. Images were taken to capture the location of tear initiation and subsequent progression. Tendon stiffness and nominal strain were measured throughout the tendon’s lifecycle to determine changes to the biomechanical properties as a function of tear size. The location of tear initiation was 15.89 ± 3.33 mm (range: 13.00 – 22.22 mm) from the anterior edge of the supraspinatus tendon. As tears progressed, tendon stiffness decreased (R 2 = 0.68, p < 0.001), and nominal strain increased (R 2 = 0.71, p < 0.001). Biomechanical changes to the supraspinatus tendon occurred between the following tear sizes: 0 – 100 mm 2 and 100 – 200 mm 2 ( p = 0.001) and between 100 – 200 mm 2 and 400 mm 2 or larger ( p < 0.001). In a biomechanical model of rotator cuff tears induced by fatigue loading, tear initiation was observed approximately 16 mm posterior to the biceps tendon, positioning it further posterior than previously believed. Alterations to the biomechanical properties occur due to tear progression. However, these changes are most severe and significant when tears progress to >100 mm 2 and further progress to >400 mm 2 . These insights provide a potentially clinically relevant definition of tear progression based on biomechanical changes to the supraspinatus tendon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garcia et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: