Discrete-choice experiment reveals Dutch households prefer electric and hydrogen heating over district systems, highlighting consumer demand for decentralized low-carbon heat.
Most studies on decarbonizing space and water heating focus on the potential of low-carbon heating technologies from a top-down perspective, while there has been limited research on consumer preferences for low-carbon heat. To address this gap, we conduct a discrete-choice experiment among 1797 individuals in the Netherlands to estimate the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for residential-heating systems. Our results from the latent-class logit (LCL) model indicate that, on average, Dutch households are willing to pay a premium on their current monthly energy bill of 33% for electricity and 29.4% for hydrogen relative to using gas for heat production, 15.3% for reducing the amount of CO 2 emissions per kWh of heat with 100 g and 16% for having the option to switch between energy retailers. In contrast, they require a discount of 28.4% for district-heating systems relative to standalone home appliances. Additionally, the class-profiling analysis indicates that individuals with higher education and income levels in the Northern Netherlands have the highest WTP for low-carbon electricity and hydrogen. These findings suggest that policymakers should favor decentralized heating solutions over district-heating systems to facilitate an energy transition in the residential sector. If district-heating systems are implemented, combining them with electricity or hydrogen instead of natural gas is recommended to realize higher consumer welfare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rekker et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: