Why the study?
No presently available drugs have improved survival in HFpEF, highlighting the failure of generalized therapeutic strategies and motivating personalized medicine targeting specific phenotypes.
Does personalized medicine improve outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction compared to a generalized therapeutic strategy?
Does personalized medicine improve outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction compared to a generalized therapeutic strategy?
The heterogeneity of HFpEF necessitates a shift from generalized therapeutic strategies to personalized medicine targeting specific patient phenotypes to improve outcomes.
Heart failure (HF) with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (HFpEF) represent today the largest 'unmet medical need', because none of the drugs presently available improved survival in this consistent proportion of patients with HF, ∼50% of the total, who have an LV ejection fraction ≥50%. Heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction is a clinical syndrome that in its classical form, is associated to typical risk factors and comorbidities. The comorbidities represent one of the element contributing to the extreme heterogeneity which characterizes HFpEF. The pathophysiological mechanisms, as well as the clinical presentation, are multifaceted. These factors explain, by and large, the failure of a generalized therapeutic strategy, while build the argument for personalized medicine, designed to address the specific phenotypes, with therapies proven in specific subgroups of patients with HFpEF to reduce mortality and improve 'surrogate' outcomes, such as quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gori et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: