The irregular ventricular response in atrial fibrillation is weakly predictable but not governed by a low-dimensional chaotic attractor, challenging the strict mathematical definition of it being 'chaotic'.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Questions chaotic classification of AF ventricular response; leaves open whether predictability metrics inform rate control.
The ventricular response in atrial fibrillation is often described as "chaotic," but this has not been demonstrated in the strict mathematical sense. A defining feature of chaotic systems is sensitive dependence on initial conditions: similar sequences evolve similarly in the short term but then diverge exponentially. We developed a nonlinear predictive forecasting algorithm to search for predictability and sensitive dependence on initial conditions in the ventricular response during atrial fibrillation. The algorithm was tested for simulated R-R intervals from a linear oscillator with and without superimposed white noise, a chaotic signal (the logistic map) with and without superimposed white noise, and a pseudorandom signal and was then applied to R-R intervals from 16 chronic atrial fibrillation patients. Short-term predictability was demonstrated for the linear oscillators, without loss of predictive ability farther into the future. The chaotic system demonstrated high short-term predictability that declined rapidly further into the future. The pseudorandom signal was unpredictable. The ventricular response in atrial fibrillation was weakly predictable (statistically significant predictability in 8 of 16 patients), without sensitive dependence on initial conditions. Although the R-R interval sequence is not completely unpredictable, a low-dimensional chaotic attractor does not govern the irregular ventricular response during atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steín et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: