Why the study?
Does atrial fibrillation increase serum NT-proBNP levels in 75-year-old subjects compared to those in sinus rhythm?
Does atrial fibrillation increase serum NT-proBNP levels in 75-year-old subjects compared to those in sinus rhythm?
Atrial fibrillation is independently associated with elevated NT-proBNP levels in stable 75-year-old outpatients, with permanent AF causing greater elevations than paroxysmal AF.
AF independently elevates NT-proBNP in stable elderly outpatients; leaves open whether AF type refines biomarker-guided risk stratification.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) on serum levels of N-terminal fragment of pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in a 75-year-old population. METHODS: All 75-year-old citizens in Asker and Baerum counties in Norway were invited to participate in a prevalence study of AF. Blood samples for measurement of NT-proBNP were collected at rest from 61 subjects with AF and a gender-matched control group of 126 subjects in sinus rhythm. NT-proBNP was measured in serum using the Elecsys proBNP sandwich immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). RESULTS: Subjects with permanent AF had higher levels of NT-proBNP (median 1119 pg/mL (interquartile range 701, 1643)) than subjects with paroxysmal AF (257 pg/mL (169, 382)) and controls (95 pg/mL (60, 171)), p<0.001 for both.The presence of AF was still significantly associated with higher log NT-proBNP (B=0.61, p<0.001) after adjusting for the presence of heart failure, coronary heart disease and hypertension. CONCLUSION: In this stable, out-of-hospital population of 75-year-old subjects, AF was independently associated with increased levels of NT-proBNP. Permanent AF was associated with higher NT-proBNP levels than paroxysmal AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ulimoen et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: