Why the study?
Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) potentially protect against atherothrombotic events, but data evaluating the impact of cilostazol on EPC levels in high-risk patients were lacking.
Does adjunctive cilostazol improve endothelial progenitor cell mobilization and reduce platelet reactivity in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing PCI?
Does adjunctive cilostazol improve endothelial progenitor cell mobilization and reduce platelet reactivity in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing PCI?
Adding cilostazol to standard dual antiplatelet therapy in AMI patients undergoing PCI significantly enhances endothelial progenitor cell mobilization and reduces platelet reactivity at 30 days.
Adjunctive cilostazol may aid endothelial repair post-AMI; extends RCT evidence for pleiotropic effects beyond standard DAPT.
Background: Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have the potential to protect against atherothrombotic event occurrences. There are no data to evaluate the impact of cilostazol on EPC levels in high-risk patients. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the effect of adjunctive cilostazol on EPC mobilization and platelet reactivity in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Before discharge, patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomly assigned to receive cilostazol SR capsule (200-mg) a day (n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) on top of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with clopidogrel and aspirin. Before randomization (baseline) and at 30-day follow-up, circulating EPC levels were analyzed using flow cytometry and hemostatic measurements were evaluated by VerifyNow and thromboelastography assays. The primary endpoint was the relative change in EPC levels between baseline and 30-day. Results: At baseline, there were similar levels of EPC counts between treatments, whereas patients with cilostazol showed higher levels of EPC counts compared with placebo after 30 days. Cilostazol versus placebo treatment displayed significantly higher changes in EPC levels between baseline and follow-up (ΔCD133+/KDR+: difference 216%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 44~388%, p = 0.015; ΔCD34+/KDR+: difference 183%, 95% CI 25~342%, p = 0.024). At 30-day follow-up, platelet reactivity was lower in the cilostazol group compared with the placebo group (130 ± 45 versus 169 ± 62 P2Y12 Reaction Unit, p = 0.009). However, there were no significant correlations between the changes of EPC levels and platelet reactivity. Conclusion: Adjunctive cilostazol on top of clopidogrel and aspirin versus DAPT alone is associated with increased EPC mobilization and decreased platelet reactivity in AMI patients, suggesting its pleiotropic effects against atherothrombotic events (NCT04407312).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: