Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A new and simple proof is given of the known theorem that, if T 1 , T 2 ,… is an infinite sequence of finite trees, then there exist i and j such that i < j and T i is homeomorphic to a subtree of T j .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
C. St. J. A. Nash‐Williams (1963) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: